Skip to main content
NewThe State of Cybersecurity in East Africa 2026
Seraph Cyber
Human Risk Scoring

Understand where human-related security risk is concentrated.

A single phishing click does not define a user. Seraph brings together available behavioural signals over time to help organisations understand patterns of human risk across users, teams and departments.

Why It Matters

Isolated incidents rarely tell the full story.

One click, one late report or one missed training session says little on its own. Seen as a pattern over time, the same signals show where real support is needed.

Signals May Include

Where supported:

  • simulation interaction
  • credential submission
  • reporting behaviour
  • time to report
  • repeat risky behaviour
  • training completion
  • assessment performance
  • improvement over time

Risk View

Risk should be shown as context, not punishment. The purpose of scoring is to identify:

  • groups needing support
  • recurring patterns
  • elevated exposure
  • improvement over time
  • areas requiring targeted training

Important Principle

Human Risk Scores should not be presented as permanent employee labels. Scores should change as behaviour and evidence change.

See It In Action
Department Risk SnapshotIllustrative example
  • GroupFinance
  • Signals Tracked4
  • TrendImproving
  • StatusUpdated weekly
Security Outcomes

Focus effort where the evidence points.

Help security teams focus awareness and intervention where evidence suggests it is most needed.

See human risk in context.

Tell us about your organisation and current human risk programme. Our team will help scope the right next step.