Seraph CTI tracks the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue and enriches it with exploitability, technology context and threat intelligence — to help security teams prioritise what requires attention first.
Thousands of vulnerabilities are disclosed every year. The challenge isn't identifying every vulnerability — it's understanding which ones attackers are actively using, and which of those are relevant to your environment.
CISA KEV answers the first question with authority: every entry is a vulnerability with confirmed, real-world exploitation. Seraph CTI carries that signal the rest of the way to a decision.
A weakness is disclosed.
How bad could this be, in theory.
How likely is exploitation, in practice.
Confirmed — this one is being exploited.
Which actors and campaigns are using it.
Does it touch what you actually run.
What to do, and by when.
CISA KEV is one intelligence signal — an authoritative one, but a single layer. Seraph CTI enriches it with CVSS and EPSS scoring, exploit availability, threat actor and campaign intelligence, technology relevance, and sector and regional context where evidence exists.
Seraph doesn't just answer “is this being exploited?” — it helps answer “does it matter to us?”
The public catalogue tells everyone the same thing. Signed-in Seraph CTI customers declare the technologies they run once, and get notified the moment a new KEV entry matches their stack — not the other 1,600 that don't.
Not every KEV entry carries the same weight in every sector. Seraph CTI flags vulnerabilities relevant to the technologies commonly used across identity, network/edge, server and cloud infrastructure in a given industry.
Seraph describes vulnerabilities as relevant to technologies commonly used in a sector — never as evidence that a specific CVE is actively targeting it, unless that targeting has been independently confirmed.
Where evidence supports it, Seraph CTI adds regional context — technology relevance, observed exploitation, sector exposure, threat actor activity and reported campaigns specific to East Africa.
Threat intelligence is the layer that connects every other layer of defence. A single KEV entry flows across the Seraph platform, not just into a report.
Determine whether affected assets exist in the organization.
Safely validate relevant vulnerabilities where appropriate.
Correlate exploitation intelligence with security events.
Track remediation, risk and control obligations.
Determine whether affected technologies exist in your environment.
Review exploitation activity, threat context and asset importance.
Escalate vulnerabilities that represent material organisational risk.
Confirm remediation and continue monitoring.
Can't find what you need? Ask a security expert.
Monitor your technology stack, receive priority threat intelligence and understand what requires action before exposure becomes an incident.
Every KEV entry is a real vulnerability with a real deadline. Here's the most recently added one, shown exactly as Seraph CTI tracks it.
JFrog Artifactory Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory Vulnerability
Apply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.
For CVE-2026-66384, added to the catalogue on Aug 27, 2026 with a remediation deadline of Sep 10, 2026.
Computed live from the full tracked catalogue — not a static snapshot.
Is exploitation activity accelerating?
Whose products need the most attention?
How exploitable is the average KEV entry?
Based on 1,685 entries with a published EPSS score.
How many KEVs are tied to known ransomware use?
How long between listing and deadline?
1,685 vulnerabilities match your filters.
| CVE | Vendor / Product | EPSS | Date Added | Remediation Due | Ransomware Use | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2009-0556 | Microsoft Office | 67.5% | Jan 07, 2026 | Jan 28, 2026 Overdue | Unknown | View |
| CVE-2025-14847 | MongoDB MongoDB and MongoDB Server | 83.2% | Dec 29, 2025 | Jan 19, 2026 Overdue | Unknown | View |
| CVE-2023-52163 |
Digiever DS-2105 Pro |
| 96.9% |
| Dec 22, 2025 |
Jan 12, 2026 Overdue |
| Unknown |
| View |
| CVE-2025-14733 | WatchGuard Firebox | 26.5% | Dec 19, 2025 | Dec 26, 2025 Overdue | Unknown | View |
| CVE-2025-20393 | Cisco Multiple Products | 29.9% | Dec 17, 2025 | Dec 24, 2025 Overdue | Unknown | View |
| CVE-2025-40602 | SonicWall SMA1000 appliance | 2.1% | Dec 17, 2025 | Dec 24, 2025 Overdue | Unknown | View |
| CVE-2025-59374 | ASUS Live Update | 1.2% | Dec 17, 2025 | Jan 07, 2026 Overdue | Unknown | View |
| CVE-2025-59718 | Fortinet Multiple Products | 68.7% | Dec 16, 2025 | Dec 23, 2025 Overdue | Unknown | View |
| CVE-2025-43529 | Apple Multiple Products | 8.9% | Dec 15, 2025 | Jan 05, 2026 Overdue | Unknown | View |
| CVE-2025-14611 | Gladinet CentreStack and Triofox | 53.3% | Dec 15, 2025 | Jan 05, 2026 Overdue | Unknown | View |
| CVE-2025-14174 | Google Chromium | 22.6% | Dec 12, 2025 | Jan 02, 2026 Overdue | Unknown | View |
| CVE-2018-4063 | Sierra Wireless AirLink ALEOS | 27.1% | Dec 12, 2025 | Jan 02, 2026 Overdue | Unknown | View |
| CVE-2025-58360 | OSGeo GeoServer | 64.9% | Dec 11, 2025 | Jan 01, 2026 Overdue | Unknown | View |
| CVE-2025-62221 | Microsoft Windows | 2.4% | Dec 09, 2025 | Dec 30, 2025 Overdue | Unknown | View |
| CVE-2025-6218 | RARLAB WinRAR | 90.5% | Dec 09, 2025 | Dec 30, 2025 Overdue | Unknown | View |
| CVE-2025-66644 | Array Networks ArrayOS AG | 3.5% | Dec 08, 2025 | Dec 29, 2025 Overdue | Unknown | View |
| CVE-2022-37055 | D-Link Routers | 55.5% | Dec 08, 2025 | Dec 29, 2025 Overdue | Unknown | View |
| CVE-2025-55182 | Meta React Server Components | 99.8% | Dec 05, 2025 | Dec 12, 2025 Overdue | Known | View |
| CVE-2021-26828 | OpenPLC ScadaBR | 39.4% | Dec 03, 2025 | Dec 24, 2025 Overdue | Unknown | View |
| CVE-2025-48572 | Android Framework | 0.3% | Dec 02, 2025 | Dec 23, 2025 Overdue | Unknown | View |
| CVE-2025-48633 | Android Framework | 0.3% | Dec 02, 2025 | Dec 23, 2025 Overdue | Unknown | View |
| CVE-2021-26829 | OpenPLC ScadaBR | 48.0% | Nov 28, 2025 | Dec 19, 2025 Overdue | Unknown | View |
| CVE-2025-61757 | Oracle Fusion Middleware | 88.2% | Nov 21, 2025 | Dec 12, 2025 Overdue | Unknown | View |
| CVE-2025-13223 | Google Chromium V8 | 5.0% | Nov 19, 2025 | Dec 10, 2025 Overdue | Unknown | View |
| CVE-2025-58034 | Fortinet FortiWeb | 55.6% | Nov 18, 2025 | Nov 25, 2025 Overdue | Unknown | View |