Seraph CTI tracks the CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalogue and enriches it with exploitability, technology context and threat intelligence — to help security teams prioritise what requires attention first.
Thousands of vulnerabilities are disclosed every year. The challenge isn't identifying every vulnerability — it's understanding which ones attackers are actively using, and which of those are relevant to your environment.
CISA KEV answers the first question with authority: every entry is a vulnerability with confirmed, real-world exploitation. Seraph CTI carries that signal the rest of the way to a decision.
A weakness is disclosed.
How bad could this be, in theory.
How likely is exploitation, in practice.
Confirmed — this one is being exploited.
Which actors and campaigns are using it.
Does it touch what you actually run.
What to do, and by when.
CISA KEV is one intelligence signal — an authoritative one, but a single layer. Seraph CTI enriches it with CVSS and EPSS scoring, exploit availability, threat actor and campaign intelligence, technology relevance, and sector and regional context where evidence exists.
Seraph doesn't just answer “is this being exploited?” — it helps answer “does it matter to us?”
The public catalogue tells everyone the same thing. Signed-in Seraph CTI customers declare the technologies they run once, and get notified the moment a new KEV entry matches their stack — not the other 1,600 that don't.
Not every KEV entry carries the same weight in every sector. Seraph CTI flags vulnerabilities relevant to the technologies commonly used across identity, network/edge, server and cloud infrastructure in a given industry.
Seraph describes vulnerabilities as relevant to technologies commonly used in a sector — never as evidence that a specific CVE is actively targeting it, unless that targeting has been independently confirmed.
Where evidence supports it, Seraph CTI adds regional context — technology relevance, observed exploitation, sector exposure, threat actor activity and reported campaigns specific to East Africa.
Threat intelligence is the layer that connects every other layer of defence. A single KEV entry flows across the Seraph platform, not just into a report.
Determine whether affected assets exist in the organization.
Safely validate relevant vulnerabilities where appropriate.
Correlate exploitation intelligence with security events.
Track remediation, risk and control obligations.
Determine whether affected technologies exist in your environment.
Review exploitation activity, threat context and asset importance.
Escalate vulnerabilities that represent material organisational risk.
Confirm remediation and continue monitoring.
Can't find what you need? Ask a security expert.
Monitor your technology stack, receive priority threat intelligence and understand what requires action before exposure becomes an incident.
Every KEV entry is a real vulnerability with a real deadline. Here's the most recently added one, shown exactly as Seraph CTI tracks it.
JFrog Artifactory Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory Vulnerability
Apply mitigations in accordance with vendor instructions, ensuring compliance with CISA’s BOD 26-04 Prioritizing Security Updates Based on Risk (see URL in Notes) guidance and CISA’s “Forensics Triage Requirements” (see URL in Notes). Follow applicable BOD 26-04 guidance for cloud services or discontinue use of the product if mitigations are unavailable. Stakeholders are responsible for evaluating each asset's internet exposure and ensuring adherence to BOD 26-04 patching guidelines.
For CVE-2026-66384, added to the catalogue on Aug 27, 2026 with a remediation deadline of Sep 10, 2026.
Computed live from the full tracked catalogue — not a static snapshot.
Is exploitation activity accelerating?
Whose products need the most attention?
How exploitable is the average KEV entry?
Based on 1,685 entries with a published EPSS score.
How many KEVs are tied to known ransomware use?
How long between listing and deadline?
1,685 vulnerabilities match your filters.
| CVE | Vendor / Product | EPSS | Date Added | Remediation Due | Ransomware Use | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-29574 | Sophos CyberoamOS | 4.7% | Feb 06, 2025 | Feb 27, 2025 Overdue | Known | View |
| CVE-2020-15069 | Sophos XG Firewall | 10.7% | Feb 06, 2025 | Feb 27, 2025 Overdue | Unknown | View |
Linux Kernel |
| 3.3% |
| Feb 05, 2025 |
Feb 26, 2025 Overdue |
| Unknown |
| View |
| CVE-2024-45195 | Apache OFBiz | 100.0% | Feb 04, 2025 | Feb 25, 2025 Overdue | Unknown | View |
| CVE-2024-29059 | Microsoft .NET Framework | 98.6% | Feb 04, 2025 | Feb 25, 2025 Overdue | Unknown | View |
| CVE-2018-9276 | Paessler PRTG Network Monitor | 87.2% | Feb 04, 2025 | Feb 25, 2025 Overdue | Unknown | View |
| CVE-2018-19410 | Paessler PRTG Network Monitor | 97.9% | Feb 04, 2025 | Feb 25, 2025 Overdue | Unknown | View |
| CVE-2025-24085 | Apple Multiple Products | 17.6% | Jan 29, 2025 | Feb 19, 2025 Overdue | Unknown | View |
| CVE-2025-23006 | SonicWall SMA1000 Appliances | 23.4% | Jan 24, 2025 | Feb 14, 2025 Overdue | Known | View |
| CVE-2020-11023 | JQuery JQuery | 83.8% | Jan 23, 2025 | Feb 13, 2025 Overdue | Unknown | View |
| CVE-2024-50603 | Aviatrix Controllers | 98.5% | Jan 16, 2025 | Feb 06, 2025 Overdue | Unknown | View |
| CVE-2024-55591 | Fortinet FortiOS and FortiProxy | 98.3% | Jan 14, 2025 | Jan 21, 2025 Overdue | Known | View |
| CVE-2025-21333 | Microsoft Windows | 10.0% | Jan 14, 2025 | Feb 04, 2025 Overdue | Unknown | View |
| CVE-2025-21334 | Microsoft Windows | 1.6% | Jan 14, 2025 | Feb 04, 2025 Overdue | Unknown | View |
| CVE-2025-21335 | Microsoft Windows | 1.4% | Jan 14, 2025 | Feb 04, 2025 Overdue | Unknown | View |
| CVE-2024-12686 | BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access (PRA) and Remote Support (RS) | 13.7% | Jan 13, 2025 | Feb 03, 2025 Overdue | Unknown | View |
| CVE-2023-48365 | Qlik Sense | 24.7% | Jan 13, 2025 | Feb 03, 2025 Overdue | Known | View |
| CVE-2025-0282 | Ivanti Connect Secure, Policy Secure, and ZTA Gateways | 100.0% | Jan 08, 2025 | Jan 15, 2025 Overdue | Known | View |
| CVE-2024-41713 | Mitel MiCollab | 98.1% | Jan 07, 2025 | Jan 28, 2025 Overdue | Known | View |
| CVE-2024-55550 | Mitel MiCollab | 37.8% | Jan 07, 2025 | Jan 28, 2025 Overdue | Known | View |
| CVE-2020-2883 | Oracle WebLogic Server | 94.9% | Jan 07, 2025 | Jan 28, 2025 Overdue | Unknown | View |
| CVE-2024-3393 | Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS | 28.6% | Dec 30, 2024 | Jan 20, 2025 Overdue | Unknown | View |
| CVE-2021-44207 | Acclaim Systems USAHERDS | 17.6% | Dec 23, 2024 | Jan 13, 2025 Overdue | Unknown | View |
| CVE-2024-12356 | BeyondTrust Privileged Remote Access (PRA) and Remote Support (RS) | 88.0% | Dec 19, 2024 | Dec 27, 2024 Overdue | Unknown | View |
| CVE-2018-14933 | NUUO NVRmini Devices | 94.9% | Dec 18, 2024 | Jan 08, 2025 Overdue | Unknown | View |